Tag Archives: Politically Exposed Person

Wolves crying wolf

I’m a bit wary of wading into this topic, as I am something of a dunce when it comes to working out political affiliations and machinations – even after watching a gazillion series of “The West Wing”, I’m still not … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Gone but not un-rotten

Last week a client asked me a question about dead PEPs, and in looking for the answer I realised that this is not a topic addressed by the regulator.  Which is odd, given that it is the inevitable final status … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Name and shame

We’re all used to lists and databases.  There are sanctions screening systems and PEP screening systems.  Within their organisations, MLROs have access to client databases.  And, to a greater or lesser extent, jurisdictions are getting on board with beneficial ownership … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Head, brick wall, etc.

I first started designing and delivering AML training in 1996.  That’s a full quarter-century ago.  And can you imagine how many times I have said, over those twenty-five years, things like “check regularly for PEPs – regulators are hot on … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Ho-ho-ho and CDD

I am assuming that one or two of you might be at work today, so let us turn our AML minds to an important seasonal matter: conducting CDD on Father Christmas.  For this particular individual even the most basic identity … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Is that why it’s called a PEP rally?

I am of An Age where every working surface in our house has been equipped with a cheap pair of reading glasses – who knows when I will need to read that care label, cooking instruction or baffling piece of … Continue reading

Posted in AML, Due diligence, Legislation, Money laundering | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

No, no, no to UWO, UWO, UWO

Most of us in the world of AML have welcomed the advent of the Unexplained Wealth Order – the court order introduced by the Criminal Finances Act 2017, which can be served to compel either a PEP or someone involved … Continue reading

Posted in AML, Bribery and corruption, Money laundering | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Tainted treasures indeed

I have always been a swot, living mainly in my head.  Physically I’ve never been much cop; I was always the one picked last – and even then, reluctantly – for sports teams, and my clumsiness is legendary.  But in … Continue reading

Posted in Bribery and corruption, Money laundering | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Some are more equal than others

The connection between PEPs [politically exposed persons] and money laundering is recognised: with access to public influence and public money, these individuals in positions of high public service can fall prey to their baser desires and start feathering their private … Continue reading

Posted in AML, Money laundering | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Anna Karenina and the assault rifle

PEPs = high risk = EDD.  But why?  The short answer is corruption: anyone with access to public influence and/or public money will be a target for criminals who want to gain that access for themselves.  Of course, the majority … Continue reading

Posted in AML, Bribery and corruption | Tagged , , , , , , , | 4 Comments