Sixth sense

Right, here’s a little quiz for you: as of today, it’s 78 days until what?  Points deducted if you simply say, “Thursday 3 December” – although points added if you know that that’s my mother-in-law’s birthday [note to self: remind husband].  In all the excitement about MLD5 and Brexit and the thrill of breaking international legislation (oh, plus a pandemic – and please can we stop calling it a “global pandemic” because pandemos already means everybody…), we have clean forgotten to get worked up about MLD6.  And MLD6 requires that “Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 3 December 2020”.

As you doubtless remember from the giddy days of October 2018 when MLD6 came into being, this is a slightly different MLD to the usual ones: most of the others have dealt primarily with AML concerns – who is in the AML family, what CDD they need to do, what the risk-based approach means, who should be considered a PEP, and so on.  But MLD6 is all about the crime itself: what exactly is money laundering, who can be punished (and how much) for doing it, and what to do about that pesky dual criminality.  And yes, you’re right: these are Big Topics.  Which have been entirely overshadowed by MBILP*.  And no self-respecting MLRO can go a moment longer without putting MLD6 firmly back on the radar – remember, it’s only 78 days away.

I can’t possibly go into all the detail here, but (a) MLD6 is only sixteen short Articles so doesn’t take long to read in full, and (b) oh, go on then, here are the highlights:

  • Article 2 provides a harmonised list of the 22 offences that are considered to be criminal activity [i.e. a predicate offence that can lead to money laundering] – a Member State can add more, but this is the minimum, and the list includes trafficking in almost anything, environmental crime, tax crimes and cybercrime
  • Article 4 confirms that “aiding and abetting, inciting and attempting” money laundering are also criminal offences
  • Article 6 talks about aggravating circumstances [no, not being a liberal Englishwoman alive in 2020, although that is pretty aggravating], including being a member of an organised crime group, or being an “obliged entity” (i.e. a business covered by AML obligations) and still indulging in money laundering, bringing us to…
  • Article 7, which drops the bombshell that “legal persons can be held liable for any of the [money laundering] offences”, and
  • Article 10 introduces information-sharing requirements between jurisdictions so that a criminal prosecution for connected offences can take place in more than one EU Member State.

Yes, it’s quite the directive.  As for what the UK is doing about it, your guess is as good as mine (and almost certainly contains fewer swear-words).

* MLD5, Brexit, international legislation and pandemic

Thanks to James in Cornwall for reminding me to get my dander up about how MLD6 has been overlooked

This entry was posted in AML, Legislation, Money laundering and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Sixth sense

  1. Martin Woods says:

    I am pleased to report I did not get the right answer to your question, not even the 3rd December. Initially you caused me to panic as I thought it was Christmas – I know I was a long way out. As to 6MLD, is there anything really new here? In the event the answer is yes, I must ponder was it not previously a crime? Given the output from the FCA, perhaps this is correct. Hopefully it will be a stepping stone which will drive the endeavour to join the dots between the dirty, often blood soaked money and the evil, violent crimes which generated the same. We will wait and see,

    • Thank you for your comment, Martin – and you have a bit longer to buy those Christmas pressies. I think you’re right, that for us here in the UK this is more of a reminder/clarification – but for some other EU Member States, there will be significant impact. And we’re all going to have to come to terms with corporate offences – which personally I think is the right step. Like you, I think that any headlines around money laundering – such as the arrival of new legislation – serve as a reminder to all involved (and to the general public) that there is still plenty of work to be done.

  2. David Winch says:

    I understand there is a possibility that the UK might wish to introduce a corporate ‘failure to prevent’ offence in relation to money laundering – along the lines of the failure to prevent bribery and failure to prevent tax evasion offences.

  3. Daren Piper says:

    Good post, but hasn’t the UK (and Ireland) opted not to adopt 6MLD?

    I’m not a lawyer, but paragraph 23 of the introductory text seems to suggest that.

    ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________


    • Welcome to the blog, Daren, and thank you for your comment. Absolutely right, yes: the UK and Ireland are not adopting it. But not adopting it does not mean we can just ignore it – and lots of MLROs will be part of international organisations that do have to take notice of it. It’s tempting (for some…!) to think that on leaving the EU we can just forget about it and its Directives, but if a UK institution wants to send money overseas, it will have to convince the recipient institution that the correct AML standards are still being observed. So I am stirring the pot a little when I say I’m keen to know what the UK plans to do about this…!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.