Facing up to laundering

In my last post I sang the praises of a Twitter-bot (I still don’t know what that means) which sends out an alert every time a plane associated with an autocratic regime visits Geneva airport, which strikes me as a prime example of technology being used as a force for good.  And another example was highlighted on the BBC news website recently.  In short, a fellow called Mr Ao was wanted in Zhangshu in south-eastern China for “economic crimes”.  Perhaps enjoying the fruits of his labours, he and his wife travelled nearly sixty miles to Nanchang to go to a concert by Hong Kong pop star (and “God of Songs”) Jacky Cheung.  What Mr Ao did not realise is that some of China’s 170 million CCTV cameras were installed at the gates to the concert venue, and some nifty facial recognition software quickly alerted the local police that a wanted man was on their patch.  As Mr Ao took his seat, presumably loaded down with over-priced snacks and fizzy pop, he was apprehended by the boys in blue.  (I’ve checked: police uniforms in China are indeed blue.)

I am well aware of – and have some sympathy with – the privacy concerns about CCTV coverage.  But I take comfort from knowing that, with current understaffing in law enforcement, there is probably not someone sitting watching my every move as I traipse longingly from bookshop to Hotel Chocolat to Russell & Bromley before admitting defeat and buying boring old dinner in Sainsbury’s.  In other words, most CCTV recordings are never examined.  But if you can add reliable face recognition capability to the system, isn’t it the perfect tool for tracking criminals?  Imagine being able to identify a suspected money launderer and then gather video evidence as s/he attends meetings all over town – with the added benefit of being able to spot all the colluding enablers along the way.  If a system can pick up Mr Ao entering the venue and then locate him among the 60,000 seats before the God of Songs has even cleared his throat, following a launderer calling at plush offices all over London or New York or Singapore would surely be a doddle.

This entry was posted in AML, Due diligence, Money laundering and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Facing up to laundering

  1. CDWOS says:

    “a doddle” absolutely whether the system is being used honestly or dishonestly! A system for good can be turned to the “dark side” just as effectively and efficiently!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s