But it is your business

Sometimes I think we can get so bogged down in paperwork (“Who can certify this copy document?”, “What about the client who does everything online and so has no paper statements or bill?) that we forget our most potent AML tool: our common-sense, our feeling that something just isn’t right.  I often point out in training that AML legislation (at least in the jurisdictions where I work) requires you to verify identity, but only to enquire about the client’s business and expected pattern of activity and transactions.  And because the latter does not require documentary proof, I think it is sometimes forgotten or downgraded.

Earlier this month, police in Los Angeles raided around fifty businesses in the downtown garment district, looking for money being laundered (in our sense, not the garment sense) on behalf of the Sinaloa drug cartel in Mexico.  After a day of raids the police walked away with about US$65 million in cash; in one warehouse alone, they found $35 million.  It’s all part of the Black Market Peso Exchange, whereby drug traffickers use their illegal US dollars from drug sales to buy goods in the US and export them to Mexico, where they receive clean pesos in exchange.  They can thus avoid carrying large amounts of US currency across the (heavily-policed) border to Mexico, or having to channel it through financial institutions, where eagle-eyed MLROs will spot it.  Leading Operation Fashion Police, Assistant US Attorney Robert Dugdale said that Los Angeles had “become the epicentre of narco-dollar money laundering with couriers regularly bringing duffel bags and suitcases full of cash to many businesses”.

Well, you can see where I am going with this.  All of these garment businesses had bank accounts into which they paid these vast sums of cash.  Did the banks ask whether cash payments are usual in the garment industry?  Did they ask why, for instance, QT Fashion, specialising in maternity wear, was suddenly doing so well that its takings were up by millions a month?  That’s a lot of stretchy tights and roomy smocks.  It’s the old-fashioned (groan) questions that matter: does this fit (double groan) with what I know about my customer’s business, and about businesses like his?  How often do account managers visit their customer’s premises to make sure that business on the ground matches business through the account?

This entry was posted in Due diligence, Money laundering and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to But it is your business

  1. Roy McCarthy says:

    Susan do you get the impression that banks, with unrelenting pressure on margins, are taking a chance with what they might regard as discretionary spend on their compliance function? Maybe I’m way off.

  2. Hello Roy
    It is hard for me to say, because – by definition – I deal only with banks that do not regard the compliance spend as discretionary (as they are willing to buy my training or my books). But I do know, as of course do you, that it is an uphill struggle for MLROs to get budget for something that does not generate profit – only prevents loss of profit. It’s like buying insurance: those premiums seem discretionary until you wish you had paid them!
    One can only hope that shareholders put pressure on banks to be more conservative (by spending something on safeguarding the profits they have) and moral (by genuinely seeking to guard against the contamination of their business by criminal or terrorist funds).
    Best wishes from Susan

  3. Pingback: The realms of cash | I hate money laundering

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.