Running away to join the circus

Well, it happened again.  You remember that I once said that when I go out to dinner and say what I do for a living, I often find myself held responsible for the due diligence woes of the whole table, not to mention their extended families?  My lovely hostess, trying to knit common ground between a diverse group of guests, started talking about Bernie Madoff, everyone’s favourite Ponzi fraudster.  “How do you know so much about him?” demanded the university science professor to my left.  I explained.  Oh dear.  Will I never learn?  “What I object to,” he declaimed, “Is being accused of being a criminal every time I go into my bank.”  For his view is that, by asking impertinent questions about his money, his bank is saying that he is a criminal and is therefore required to explain himself.

While our poor hostess tried to distract us with chocolate mousse, he then told the story of when he was travelling through Europe as a young adult, wearing old clothes, a full beard and a long Afro, and transport police in the Netherlands stopped him and questioned him.  “Why me?” he asked, and they showed him a sheet of photos of members of the Baader-Meinhof gang – at the time, Germany’s most notorious urban guerrilla group.  “I looked like all of them,” he admitted. “Even the women.”  So, I asked, was that not justification for the police stopping you?  “No: they should have been certain that I was a member of the group before taking away my liberties and asking rude questions.”  So MLROs, take note: you should not do due diligence on anyone until you are certain that they are criminal.  And of course once criminals know that this is the case, doing any due diligence at all could well count as tipping off.  Bags I not write the handbook on how that could work.  And next time anyone asks me at a dinner party, I’m going to say that I am a trapeze artist with the circus – much less controversial.  And much more spangly.

This entry was posted in General thoughts, Money laundering and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Running away to join the circus

  1. Claire says:

    Well, Sue, I’d ask to see one of those trapeze tricks… on the chandelier 😉 I know it is very annoying having to explain where your money comes from when you have obtained it legally. And some of those interrogators really enjoy their job and the power that comes with it. I’d like to know how this dinner guest would feel about due diligence the day he is victim of a crime. Will he tell the police to just wait until the criminal comes to present himself at the police station? Because after all, you are not allowed to inconvenience any innocent people with questions…

  2. Hello Claire
    You are right, as usual – having to undergo due diligence is an irritation for everyone. But quite how finance sector workers are meant to decipher who is a criminal without asking them anything is a bit of a mystery! Personally, I always feel that you shouldn’t mind answering questions if you have nothing to hide, but I do know that other people have more of an issue with privacy than I do. As you say, I would like to see his response to being a victim – I suppose he would say that the police should not arrest anyone unless they see them actually in the process of the criminal act, which is rather rare…
    Best wishes from Sue

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.